- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:59:41 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29960
Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
--- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
Good point on that last para.
Is it worthwhile adding a Note that errors in XML are outside of the scope of
static errors and will likely be reported, but since creating an XDM from a
source is implementation-defined, processor's behavior for XML errors, or
whether these are corrected or ignored, is also implementation-defined.
(I'm not saying I'm considering running html-tidy to fix XSLT-XML or something,
but externally parsed entities that aren't required and cannot be fetched could
reasonably be ignored. Moreover, I think this already is
implementation-defined.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 15:59:47 UTC