- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:48:03 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29951 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I think the best answer to this might be to put suitable caveats in the spec: * implementations should not be required to support the "saved" option. * if they do support it, they may impose restrictions such as not allowing two result documents to be written to the same destination, or not allowing a destination to be read and written within the same query, etc. * users should be aware that side-effects cannot be relied upon, for example if the actual result of the fn:transform call is not used, or is only partially used, then the side-effects of the call may not happen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 09:48:16 UTC