- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:04:48 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29938 --- Comment #2 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- These are valid points. I don't know how often these are used in practice and I figured it best to bring them in line with other specs (principal of least surprise). But I get your point on effort vs reward (apart from your last point: we'd be dropping an error scenario that wouldn't have run in XSLT 2.0 to begin with, so no backwards compat issues would arise). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2016 02:04:58 UTC