- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:23:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29887 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- There are a few other cases of the same problem. Line 180 <xs:assert test="not(exists(@select) and (exists(* except xsl:fallback) or exists(text()[normalize-space()])))"/> exists(@select) ==> exists(@select|@_select) Line 327, 690, 728, 1374 <xs:assert test="every $e in subsequence(xsl:sort, 2) satisfies empty($e/@stable)"> $e/@stable ==> $e/(@stable|@_stable) Line 371, 503, 530, 552, 615 <xs:assert test="not(exists(@type) and exists(@validation))"> ==> not(exists(@type|@_type) and exists(@validation|@_validation)) Line 737 count((@group-by, @group-adjacent, @group-starting-with, @group-ending-with)) = 1 ==> count((@group-by|@_group-by, @group-adjacent|@_group-adjcent, @group-starting-with|@_group-starting-with, @group-ending-with|@_group-ending-with)) = 1 (could use the comma operator throughout but it feels more expressive this way) Line 746 if (exists(@collation) or exists(@composite)) then (exists(@group-by) or exists(@group-adjacent)) else true()" ==> as elsewhere, replace @X by @X|@_X Line 807, 814, 821, 890, Line 1085 test="not(exists(@name) and normalize-space(@visibility) = 'private' and exists(xsl:context-item))" this one is more tricky because it's looking at attribute values. But the rule is obsolete because xsl:mode no longer has an xsl:context-item child. Slightly surprised Saxon's static type checking lets that through. line 1182 <xs:assert test="every $prefix in (@stylesheet-prefix, @result-prefix)[. ne '#default'] satisfies $prefix = in-scope-prefixes(.)"/> we can keep this as is. line 1186 test="if (exists(@value)) then empty((@select, @count, @from)) and @level='single' else true()"> Usual @X by @X|@_X except that @level='single' becomes (@level='single' or @_level) line 1134 <xs:assert test="if (normalize-space(@static) = 'yes') then empty((*,text())) else true()"> Leave as is. etc. etc. All the remaining assertions fit into one of the above patterns. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 15:23:10 UTC