- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:04:01 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29547 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED --- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I don't understand the change that was made to these tests: > cbcl-cast-gYear-003: "-0000" cast as xs:gYear > cbcl-cast-gYearMonth-004: "-0000-05" cast as xs:gYearMonth Previously the tests had no XSD dependency, and were expected to fail FORG0001, which I think was correct: year zero is not valid under XSD 1.0. Now the tests have been changed to have a dependency on XSD 1.1. I think this makes the cast succeed. But the expected results have been changed to allow a choice of errors: FORG0001 or FODT0001. I think there should be two versions of each of these two tests: (a) an XSD 1.0 version which expects FORG0001 (b) an XSD 1.1 version which expects either success, or FODT0001. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 12:04:17 UTC