W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2016

[Bug 29907] [FO31] References missing links

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:24:28 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29907-523-Lmx5hz6GXd@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29907

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
Will review these.

However, I don't think we should link to a URL if it's only a shopping site
where you can buy the paper document: we should link to the definitive
publication, whether that's on paper or online. Bibliographies in the off-line
world give you enough information to identify the document, they don't tell you
where to find your nearest bookshop.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 09:24:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:58:02 UTC