- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:32:34 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29908 --- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- In addition, we say "It is ·implementation-defined· which version of the database is used.". I think this is unclear, as the current link, nor the new link, clearly speaks of versions, unless what is meant is any of the historical databases? Perhaps we can change this to, say, "It is implementation-defined whether a historical version, or the current version, as a whole or in parts, is supported." (stressing that I don't think we mean to have to support either all, or nothing, or do we?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 15:32:48 UTC