- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:26:03 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29827 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- After long discussion in the WG, Abel proposed a resolution here https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-wg/2016Nov/0006.html and this was accepted in principle by the WG. I have drafted the rules slightly differently, to depend on the value of declared-modes rather than on whether the stylesheet had an explicit xsl:package element (this is because I don't want to break the equivalence whereby a stylesheet rooted with xsl:stylesheet is transformed into one rooted with xsl:package). In the refactored rules, a mode M is eligible as the initial mode if any of the following conditions is true: 1. M is explicitly declared in an xsl:mode declaration, and is public or final; 2. M is the unnamed mode. 3. M is named in the default-mode attribute of the top-level module. 4. M is declared in a used package and is accepted as public or final in the top-level package. 5 declared-modes='no" and M appears as a mode-name in the mode attribute of a template rule. Leaving open for the WG to review the detailed text. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 18:26:10 UTC