[Bug 29701] [XP31] editorial fixes for 3.1.5.1 Evaluating Static and Dynamic Function Calls

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29701

--- Comment #5 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
Note that there is one more typo, 5.b.iii:

"If F's implementation is implementation-dependent not an XPath 3.1 expression"

missing a comma or "and", I think.

Re comment#3, if we would change the language, it should, of course, be changed
in both instances of this term.

My suggestion was to do that to avoid confusion (I was confused), but if it
increases confusion, let's not change it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 16:15:58 UTC