[Bug 29959] [xq31] fn:put()

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29959

--- Comment #6 from Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> ---
I see - I hadn't understood the implication of the conformance statement. Are
there tests for it? But our wording is still fuzzy: e.g. since we don't have
updating functions, is it actually meaningful?

Since people are implementing fn:transform() I'm leaning towards removing
fn:put altogether although having an fn:put optionally defined in terms of
fn:transform is still more appealing to me, as it makes it more likely to be
available.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 19:38:02 UTC