- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:58:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29958 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I can't see how 19.8.8.8 rule 4 is relevant. That rule says that if E is crawling then E[N] is striding provided N evaluates to a simple number. This case is quite different. I'm not even sure what you mean by the "rh-side". The rule is about axis expression filtered by a numeric predicate. The current rules say that this expression is crawling and we would need substantial new machinery to change that; I think the test is simply wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 17:58:34 UTC