- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:25:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29667 --- Comment #4 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- > In this case the union contains no clash: the using package has one public > component named pkg:function1 from the first use-package, and one hidden > component named pkg:function1 from the second use-package. Declaration order > is not relevant. Maybe I misunderstand, but do you mean that there is now a hidden pkg:function1 and a public pkg:function1 that happens to be the same function? But doesn't that clash with the name resolution? We try to find a component, and we may find the hidden component by that name before we find the public component. If we find the hidden component first, we have to raise an error. Though I would argue that there are not two components here, but only one, that is either hidden or public (Schrödinger's Cat anyone?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 17:25:21 UTC