- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:59:15 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29574 --- Comment #13 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- Re comment 12: I am not sure I follow your proposal. It reads to me you want to remove visibility="absent" completely? Note that with visibility="hidden" you can still, inside xsl:override, access it with xsl:original, but an absent component cannot be accessed at all (ehm, not sure this is true). So, a hidden component exists, but is hidden, an absent component is taken out of the document model, it does not exist. My argument does not mean I am against disambiguating these terms, I'm just trying to understand the depth of what we are changing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 12:59:18 UTC