- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:50:47 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29708 Bug ID: 29708 Summary: [XP31] EQName production and spaces Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XPath 3.1 Assignee: jonathan.robie@gmail.com Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- The current EQName production is: EQName ::= QName | URIQualifiedName URIQualifiedName ::= BracedURILiteral NCName /* ws: explicit */ BracedURILiteral ::= "Q" "{" [^{}]* "}" /* ws: explicit */ In a lengthy discussion [1] it turned out not to be very trivial to find out what happens if the URI inside the BracedURILiteral contains spaces. We say about this: "The namespace URI value is whitespace normalized according to the rules for the xs:anyURI type in Section 3.2.17 anyURI XS1-2 or Section 3.3.17 anyURI XS11-2" The types in XSD 1.0 and 1.1 have whitespace="collapse", which means that leading and trailing whitespace of the xs:anyURI value are removed. This makes the following equal: Q{http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/math }pi() Q{ http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/math }pi() Q{http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/math}pi() and the following indistinguishable: Q{http://foo bar}test Q{http://foo bar}test Currently, the first two above are rejected by Exselt and Saxon (as syntax error for not finding the function fn:pi()). However, the status-quo of the spec suggests this to be valid and equal (in Bug 29707 I requested some tests to this effect). Proposal: I don't think the spec is broken. I do think we ought to say something about this more explicitly than we do now (considering that two implementations seem to have got it wrong). Alternatively, disallow spaces in EQNames altogether, which will only disallow a very small corner use case (spaces in namespace URIs, which are strongly discouraged by the NS spec and cannot be used in quite a few applications). [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0068.html (and the mail thread before) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2016 17:50:51 UTC