- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:08:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29712
--- Comment #6 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
> (child::x, 23)
Isn't that also U{N}?
But I agree, the change wouldn't fix anything. The rationale was it would make
parts of the rules more readable. But we already use "type adjusted posture and
sweep" in some of the rules, which comes down to the same (if the result type
is xs:string, the posture will be grounded, even on an expression like x/y/z).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2016 14:08:58 UTC