- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:20:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29738
Bug ID: 29738
Summary: [XSLT30] (editorial) We shouldn't use the term
"streamable stylesheet" in the spec
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Candidate Recommendation
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: editorial
Priority: P2
Component: XSLT 3.0
Assignee: mike@saxonica.com
Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Target Milestone: ---
This bug is *editorial*.
I happened upon only one occurrence of this, and even though it is in a
non-normative section, I think we should not use this term, as a stylesheet as
a whole is never "streamable" by the way we use the term "streamable".
We might even add a Note explaining that stylesheets as a whole are not
streamable, but I'm agnostic to that.
The occurrence is in J.1. Changes in this Specification, item 4:
"Other changes introduced to facilitate the writing of streamable stylesheets
include:"
A suggested rewrite could be:
"Other changes introduced to facilitate the writing of stylesheets that can
process streamed documents include:"
Or use the term "guaranteed streamable constructs".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 18 July 2016 13:21:15 UTC