- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:20:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29738 Bug ID: 29738 Summary: [XSLT30] (editorial) We shouldn't use the term "streamable stylesheet" in the spec Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: editorial Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 3.0 Assignee: mike@saxonica.com Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- This bug is *editorial*. I happened upon only one occurrence of this, and even though it is in a non-normative section, I think we should not use this term, as a stylesheet as a whole is never "streamable" by the way we use the term "streamable". We might even add a Note explaining that stylesheets as a whole are not streamable, but I'm agnostic to that. The occurrence is in J.1. Changes in this Specification, item 4: "Other changes introduced to facilitate the writing of streamable stylesheets include:" A suggested rewrite could be: "Other changes introduced to facilitate the writing of stylesheets that can process streamed documents include:" Or use the term "guaranteed streamable constructs". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 18 July 2016 13:21:15 UTC