- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:25:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29712
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
It's not strictly true that the rules for filter, shallow-descent, and
deep-descent require the function to return nodes; they require its posture to
be striding or crawling, but an expression such as
(child::x, 23)
is striding even though its result includes non-nodes. So I'm inclined not to
add a rule requiring the type signature of these functions to declare a return
type of U{N}.
Apart from this, the WG approved the change to allow the function body to be
motionless, and I have applied that part of the change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 10 July 2016 17:25:29 UTC