- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:25:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29712 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- It's not strictly true that the rules for filter, shallow-descent, and deep-descent require the function to return nodes; they require its posture to be striding or crawling, but an expression such as (child::x, 23) is striding even though its result includes non-nodes. So I'm inclined not to add a rule requiring the type signature of these functions to declare a return type of U{N}. Apart from this, the WG approved the change to allow the function body to be motionless, and I have applied that part of the change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 10 July 2016 17:25:29 UTC