- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:35:05 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29398 --- Comment #5 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- I think I see it now, I was confusing the document-uri with the base-uri in the spec texts. That said, we do say that whatever the document-uri is in this case is implementation-defined: <quote> It is ·implementation-defined· whether this guarantee also holds for document nodes obtained by other means, for example a document node passed as the initial context node of a query or transformation. </quote> So, an implementation could, for instance, use a base-uri equal to the base uri of the static context and (may) add some kind of uniqueness (say, generate-id($doc), or whatever) to create an identifiable and unique document-uri. I don't agree however that "It is not possible for two distinct documents to have the same document URI.", simply because I believe the spec says otherwise, see quote above and in comment#3. Perhaps that particular Note is not specific enough? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2016 03:35:17 UTC