- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:22:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29398 --- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- In fact, I think we even make this specific, in F&O on fn:document-uri we way in a Note: <quote> In the case of a document node $D returned by the fn:doc function, or a document node at the root of a tree containing a node returned by the fn:collection function, it will always be true that either fn:document-uri($D) returns the empty sequence, or that the following expression is true: fn:doc(fn:document-uri($D)) is $D. It is ·implementation-defined· whether this guarantee also holds for document nodes obtained by other means, for example a document node passed as the initial context node of a query or transformation. </quote> So: "It is ·implementation-defined· whether this guarantee also holds for document nodes obtained by other means". But that does not answer whether the description of fn:parse-xml makes it mandatory or not, or implementation-defined to set this "resource URI". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 15:22:34 UTC