- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:15:15 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29374 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Can't really comment on the name; these things happen. Some of us like short names, some like long names, but we all hate meetings where a lot of time is spent on deciding the best terminology. The function names evolved as their specification evolved: the original idea was to have something that dynamically executed a query, but we decided that dynamically loading a query and making its functions available for execution was much more powerful, so the name changed to reflect this. I believe the current state of the conformance rules is that a query processor is required to recognize the fn:transform function, but it is allowed to throw a dynamic error if "no suitable XSLT processor is available". This means queries can be made interoperable provided they are written using try-catch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 10:15:33 UTC