- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:47:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29470
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
While recognizing the benefits, we also found some complications:
(a) It's not clear what the effect on static expressions would be
(b) It could be disruptive for some implementations that make built-in
assumptions about the behaviour of built-in functions
(c) We might need rules about compatibility of signatures between a polyfill
function and the built-in version.
So we're abandoning the proposal for now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 13:47:43 UTC