- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:36:10 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29460 Bug ID: 29460 Summary: External (non-XSLT) packages Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 3.0 Assignee: mike@saxonica.com Reporter: mike@saxonica.com QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- Originally raised on email, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-wg/2016Jan/0002.html We dropped the XQuery Invocation Feature through bug 29251 (its changes have not been logged, I reported that as an editorial bug here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29375). We know that how a package is located and presented is implementation defined. It can be a compiled package etc, etc. However, I think it makes sense to add a little Note somewhere that strongly suggests that an implementation is free to offer a package written in any language. The way we currently describe it seems to suggest that only a package with xsl:package is allowed, but a package can just as well be written in a different language (C#, Python, Java) or be an XQuery module (presented by the processor using the proper package manifest structure). This is not a bug in the spec, but it can help readers to understand that a package is a more abstract concept. Cheers, Abel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 09:36:13 UTC