https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29420 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- But thanks for pointing it out: we were getting this wrong on one execution platform, and hadn't noticed. More seriously, I don't think there were any tests (there are now) that the second argument is ignored if the sequence is non-empty: we were returning 20 rather than 10 for sum((1 to 4), 10). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 16:09:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:58 UTC