- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:59:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29796 --- Comment #2 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- You're probably right. I figured it was an omission/oversight, but if that's not the case (or if the oversight is something we can live with), I agree we shouldn't change it. That said: the sentence under xsl:key could benefit from mentioning that it only applies to document nodes, it would remove the discrepancy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 27 August 2016 16:59:27 UTC