- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:30:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 --- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- > I'll chew a bit more on this. I did the chewing :). We agreed that an xsl:variable can be overridden by an xsl:param and vv, provided the correct visibility and homonimity are present. This seems to be supported by the specification by absence of a rule that the overriding declaration of xsl:param or xsl:variable must have a matching overriding declaration (instead, we speak of "global variables" in the general sense). This could be made explicit, but I don't think there's an error here. Max Toro's comment in Bug 29574 refers to an (apparent) ambiguity in the spec: under 3.5.3.2. we explain that if you use a package with xsl:use-package, and there is *no* matching declaration inside xsl:override or xsl:accept, the default visibility of a public component becomes *private*. In the case of xsl:param this is not possible, as it is implicitly public and it has no visibility attribute. To fix this, I propose to add a row in the table under 3.5.3.2 that there's an exception for xsl:param: the default visibility does *not* change from public to private, instead, it remains public. This makes sense, because a global parameter is never private. Under 3.5.3.3 we added this exception already ("except in the case of xsl:param, which is implicitly public."). Instead of adding a Note as suggested by Max Toro, I think a normative entry in the table (under 3.5.3.2) for the xsl:param exception makes more sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2016 09:30:27 UTC