- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 08:34:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29749 Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christian.gruen@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> --- Wouldn’t it make sense to also apply the rule to fn:dateTime? If yes, I guess that the following testcases should be revised: * format-dateTime-002g * format-dateTime-002h * format-dateTime-002i * format-dateTime-003m * format-dateTime-003n * format-dateTime-003p * format-dateTime-013s * format-dateTime-013u -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 August 2016 08:35:00 UTC