- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 08:34:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29749
Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |christian.gruen@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> ---
Wouldn’t it make sense to also apply the rule to fn:dateTime? If yes, I guess
that the following testcases should be revised:
* format-dateTime-002g
* format-dateTime-002h
* format-dateTime-002i
* format-dateTime-003m
* format-dateTime-003n
* format-dateTime-003p
* format-dateTime-013s
* format-dateTime-013u
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 August 2016 08:35:00 UTC