- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:46:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29548
Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
--- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
For reference and check, the term "special-streaming-rules", which is a link
pointing to a non-existing anchor, occurs 9 times:
fn:root: 2x
fn:innermost
fn:outermost
fn:reverse
fn:position
fn:last
fn:function-lookup
fn:fold-right
Note that there are some more XSLT-specific notes on streaming, for instance in
fn:has-children. I think these have merit, though:
fn:has-children (in a Note)
fn:outermost (in a Note)
fn:uri-collection (see Bug 29551)
fn:last (in a Note)
Apart from removing "special-streaming-rules", would it make sense to have a
more generic Note somewhere in FO31 signifying that some functions may fail or
raise errors when used in a streaming context, but wouldn't raise these errors
when used in non-streaming contexts (possibly without mentioning XSLT as the
only such case)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2016 15:46:26 UTC