- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:46:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29548 Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl --- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- For reference and check, the term "special-streaming-rules", which is a link pointing to a non-existing anchor, occurs 9 times: fn:root: 2x fn:innermost fn:outermost fn:reverse fn:position fn:last fn:function-lookup fn:fold-right Note that there are some more XSLT-specific notes on streaming, for instance in fn:has-children. I think these have merit, though: fn:has-children (in a Note) fn:outermost (in a Note) fn:uri-collection (see Bug 29551) fn:last (in a Note) Apart from removing "special-streaming-rules", would it make sense to have a more generic Note somewhere in FO31 signifying that some functions may fail or raise errors when used in a streaming context, but wouldn't raise these errors when used in non-streaming contexts (possibly without mentioning XSLT as the only such case)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2016 15:46:26 UTC