- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:58:08 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29159 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I agree. I was going to suggest that the same observation also applies to fn:index-of, but it seems that this differs in that NaN != NaN. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2015 18:58:17 UTC