https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29159 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I agree. I was going to suggest that the same observation also applies to fn:index-of, but it seems that this differs in that NaN != NaN. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2015 18:58:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:56 UTC