- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:16:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29150
Bug ID: 29150
Summary: [XSLT30] Editorialities / typos
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSLT 3.0
Assignee: mike@saxonica.com
Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Target Milestone: ---
A small list of some (ir)relevant nitpicks:
1) In section 12, first Note, first para, it ends with:
the format-numberFO30 function may be more suitable: see Section 4.7.2
fn:format-number FO30.
which is essentially a double reference, the format-number function is already
hyperlinked and then we point to it again.
2) 18.1.2 Streamability examples, we write:
4. The argument to count is a RelativePathExpr that takes the form of a
motionless pattern[...]
We don't have the "if an expression can be rewritten as a motionless pattern"
rule anymore. We now have rules on Axis Steps and Path Expressions. It is still
streamable, but for other reasons.
3) In section 21 Maps, we write:
TODO: replace the error codes defined in this section by the error codes used
in XPath 3.1.
I think this has meanwhile been done (?), I don't see error codes other than
the ones that apply to XSLT only.
4) In section Abstract, we write:
TODO: describe the relationship to XPath 3.1 and related specs.
I think this was done meanwhile, I see the relevant sections.
5) In section L Changes Since LCWD
Under first item, also a "TODO": "TODO: add the streamability rules for new
expressions and functions", but I think this one is still open (I scanned for
fn:transform, but didn't find it).
6) In section B.1 Schema for the XML Representation of JSON, we write:
<xs:simpleType name="numberType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:double">
<!-- exclude positive and negative infinity, and NaN -->
<xs:minExclusive value="-INF"/>
<xs:maxExclusive value="INF"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
In the comment we say we exclude NaN, but we don't do so in the schema. Was
this intended to be excluded?
7) In section 2.3.3 Apply-Templates Invocation, we write:
The initial match selection. An API that chooses to maintain compatibility with
previous versions of this specification should allow a singleton node to be
provided, which is then used in two ways: the node itself acts as the initial
match selection, and the document node of the containing document acts as the
global context item.
However, a singleton node does not need to be rooted at a document node. Should
we be a bit more precise here (even though it is merely a suggestion to
implementors)?
8) In section 24.1 Creating Final Result Trees, we write in the fourth bullet:
The corresponding serialization parameter is not set (is "absent"). it is not
possible [...]
typo: it --> It
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 09:16:12 UTC