- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 21:00:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29027 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Reading the spec again, it says [the value of the context item is]: * If VarValue is specified, then the result of evaluating VarValue. which I think leaves little wriggle room for suggesting that it might instead be something from the external environment. I'd suggest adding a Note: Note: if a context item declaration is present, and "external" is not specified, then the context item cannot be supplied externally. It is outside the scope of this specification whether an attempt to supply a context item externally is ignored, or results in an error. We should change the test to remove the attempt to supply a context item externally, and remove "London" as a possible result. I'm not sure what to make of the statement in C.2 that the initial context item is "overwriteable" by implementations. If there's an initial context item declaration that gives the initial context item a value, I don't think we want to license implementations to ignore that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 21:00:51 UTC