- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 16:24:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29059
Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---
(In reply to Michael Kay from comment #2)
> As regards comment 0, the WG felt that there was not a strong enough
> justification for making a change at this dateTime.
:)
I was hoping for fn:parse-ietf-dateTime, leaving scope for a future
fn:parse-ietf-date which just parses the date part.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2015 16:24:24 UTC