- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:19:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29210 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- After discussion, the WG decided to go with the option that xsl:apply-imports is permitted, and is effectively a no-op (because the set of candidate template rules to consider is inevitably empty). The effect is to delete the paragraph [ERR XTSE3460] It is a static error if an xsl:apply-imports element appears in a template rule declared within an xsl:override element. (To invoke the template rule that is being overridden, xsl:next-match should therefore be used.) and replace it with a note: Note: If xsl:apply-imports is evaluated when the current template rule is declared within an xsl:override element, the set of candidate template rules will always be empty. This is because template rules for the relevant mode cannot be declared anywhere in the using package other than within the xsl:override element itself. The problems in (B) and (C) will also be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2015 20:20:00 UTC