- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:49:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29185
--- Comment #3 from Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> ---
> Presumably, though I don't see it recorded here, the effect of omitting the expression in these cases will be equivalent to writing {()}
I think so. At least this is what I assumed.
> "enclosed expression", sometimes to mean an EnclosedExpr, and sometimes to refer to other constructs that use an expression within curly braces
I don't think this makes the decision ambiguous since it was based on the
productions listed in Comment 0. i.e. this seems like more of an editorial
problem. But in any case, I agree with everything in Comment 2. Thanks for
fleshing this out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2015 14:49:48 UTC