[Bug 29207] [XQ31] reserved namespaces needs updating


Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
(disregard my prev. comment, I think I have now seen the internal draft update,
which reorganizes this a bit).

I see that the list has been upgraded to the following:

* http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
* http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions
* http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/math
* http://www.w3.org/2012/xquery
* http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/array
* http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/map

That leaves:

* http://www.w3.org/2005/xqt-errors
* http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/
* http://www.w3.org/2010/xslt-xquery-serialization
* http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform

Perhaps the xmlns namespace does not fit in this list because it is already
covered by other errors, or it could be included for completion. I am not sure
if all the others deserve a "reserved" status. If I compare it with XSLT, the
Errors namespace is reserved there (and of course the XSLT namespace). The
Serialization namespace is up for debate.

I see no harm in either including or excluding them, but we should make an
informed decision. If the policy has been to reserve namespaces that have
special meaning in (aspects of) the specs, then I think all of them should be

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 17 October 2015 14:46:47 UTC