- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:58:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29142 --- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- > 4) We currently imply that we do not disallow grounded posture, but that > if you return non-nodes, that the snapshot() call will fail. I don't see > a problem with leaving that as is (neither would I mind it if we allow > snapshot to operate on non-nodes). Point 4 quoted above has been taken over by events (we now allow atomic items for the implicit fn:snapshot() call). However, the other numbered items are still outstanding, I believe. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 15:58:53 UTC