[Bug 29189] [xslt30ts] Test case system-property-101d etc

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29189

--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
I'm now seeing many tests (e.g. system-property-101a) fail like this:

XPath assertion not(empty(/output/static-context/result)) failed

I can't see why the test would output an /output/static-context/result element.
This is what it actually produces:

<output evaluation-method="static"
        eval-static-variables="true"
        ns-normal="true">
   <global-variables>
      <static-context>
         <static-call
result-for="system-property(('xsl:version'))">3.0</static-call>
         <ref-call
result-for="system-property#1(('xsl:version'))">3.0</ref-call>
         <let-call result-for="let $f := system-property#1 return
$f(('xsl:version'))">3.0</let-call>
         <anon-call result-for="function() { system-property(('xsl:version'))
}()">3.0</anon-call>
         <partial-call
result-for="system-property(?)(('xsl:version'))">3.0</partial-call>
         <lookup-call result-for="let $f :=
function-lookup(QName('http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions',
'system-property'), 1) return (if($f instance of function(*)) then
$f(('xsl:version')) else ())">3.0</lookup-call>
      </static-context>
      <dynamic-context>
         <static-call
result-for="system-property(('xsl:version'))">3.0</static-call>
         <ref-call
result-for="system-property#1(('xsl:version'))">3.0</ref-call>
         <let-call result-for="let $f := system-property#1 return
$f(('xsl:version'))">3.0</let-call>
         <anon-call result-for="function() { system-property(('xsl:version'))
}()">3.0</anon-call>
         <partial-call
result-for="system-property(?)(('xsl:version'))">3.0</partial-call>
         <lookup-call result-for="let $f :=
function-lookup(QName('http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions',
'system-property'), 1) return (if($f instance of function(*)) then
$f(('xsl:version')) else ())">3.0</lookup-call>
      </dynamic-context>
   </global-variables>
</output>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 10 October 2015 17:39:51 UTC