[Bug 29094] [xslt 3.0] conflict between xsl:accept and xsl:override


--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
Comment #1 suggests a possible interpretation of my example, but I think if we
wanted to provide that particular capability it would make more sense to do so
by allowing the declaration within xsl:override to specify visibility="hidden".
But that's new functionality that I think we can live without. I therefore
propose the rule:

It is a static error if a token in the names attribute of an xsl:accept
element, other than a wildcard, matches the symbolic name of a component
declared within an xsl:override element that is a sibling of the xsl:accept

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2015 21:06:38 UTC