- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:37:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29119 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michael Kay from comment #12) > A SequenceType does not "describe the type of a value", it > describes the type of a set of XDM values, and empty sets are perfectly > legitimate beasts. xs:error does not describe the type of an empty set. It does not describe a type that can occur in an XDM value. It describes the type of something that a query can never encounter. > That doesn't make either expression useless, any more than the integer 0 or the string "" is useless. The integer 0 and the string "" are types of XDM values that can occur. xs:error is not. The purpose of SequenceType is to describe the types of sets of XDM values. When is it useful to have a SequenceType that describes the type of something that can never exist? Can you give me an example? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2015 10:37:30 UTC