- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:55:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #8 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- This was raised against XQ31, but sounds more like an XP31 bug to me? Anyway, fwiw, I've often stared cluelessly at a complex expression with a syntax error, only to find out at some point that I forgot the redundant "else ()". I think it is a good suggestion, it has no backward compatibility issues and the language production changes seem unambiguous. I'm sure many people will be grateful for being able to omit the mandatory 7 keystrokes. Whether its really small enough to warrant inclusion at this stage I don't know. Conversely, it makes me wonder why in XSLT there's an xsl:if *without* an xsl:else, it doesn't even exist (but we have xsl:choose as a clumsy workaround, which XPath does not have). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 16:55:33 UTC