- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:02:12 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28540 --- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- >3 evaluate fn:serialize(<e/>) as "<e/>" >1 evaluates fn:serialize(<e/>) as "<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><e/>" I understand the compatibility argument, but the fact that different implementations do different things, in my mind, adds to the importance of defining the defaults so that users get interoperable behaviour. (I don't really care very much what the defaults are, that's a second-order discussion.) We could address the compatibility concern by suggesting that implementations that have provided different defaults in previous product releases could provide a configuration switch to retain the previous behaviour. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 16:02:14 UTC