[Bug 28355] [XSLT30] (probably editorial) Unintended disappearance of XTDE0610 error


--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
Note also, bug #24539 and bug #24864 introduced changes in the error handling
in this general area, though neither explicitly proposed dropping XTDE0610.

Indeed, what bug #25158 suggested was:

** in general it is a dynamic error if a parameter is explicitly or implicitly
required and no value is supplied by the caller ([XTDE0700] or [XTDE0610]
depending on whether it is explicitly or implicitly required)

but I obviously decided at some stage that the distinction between these two
codes had no value.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 18:11:34 UTC