- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:54:12 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28319 --- Comment #6 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Abel wrote: >max((xs:integer(12), xs:decimal(10))) instance of xs:integer >will return FALSE in FO30 (tested with Saxon) but will return TRUE with the new text of FO31. The result of this test is implementation-dependent in FO30. The spec guarantees that you will get an xs:decimal, but an implementation is always permitted to return a subtype of what the spec requires, so returning an xs:integer (and thus returning TRUE) is permitted. >I do not know if this warrants a comment in the changes section of the spec, but it is a change that in rare edge cases has different results. There is already such a comment in Appendix G. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 14:54:17 UTC