- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:33:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28319 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Appears to be a duplicate of bug #26453. >The argument on the meaning of conversion (is it substitution or promotion) is still valid in FO31 (internal draft). I don't think so. The term "conversion" is defined within the rules for the min and max functions: "The resulting sequence is referred to below as the converted sequence. ". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 18:33:46 UTC