[Bug 28319] [FO30] (and [FO31]) Text on least common type and conversion in fn:min and fn:max ambiguous

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28319

--- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
Appears to be a duplicate of bug #26453.

>The argument on the meaning of conversion (is it substitution or promotion) is still valid in FO31 (internal draft).

I don't think so. The term "conversion" is defined within the rules for the min
and max functions: "The resulting sequence is referred to below as the
converted sequence. ".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 18:33:46 UTC