- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:10:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28116 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Following WG discussion: (a) I have added a note relating to the name "xsl:original", pointing out that it is used to refer to components but is not actually the name of any component. (b) I have moved section 3.2 to be closer to 5.1. Section 5 now has 5.1 Names 5.1.1 QNames 5.1.2 Unprefixed QNames 5.1.3 Reserved namespaces Section 5.1.1 no longer attempts to give an exhaustive list of named constructs; section 5.1.3 gives a complete list in the definition of the error code. (c) As actioned by the WG, I researched the question whether reserved namespaces should be permitted in the names of user-defined or implementation-defined error codes. I found that existing specfications were fairly clear that there were no constraints on the namespace used in such codes, and I concluded that introducing such a constraint was unnecessary, paternalistic, backwards-incompatible, and would require retrospective change to XPath 3.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 11:10:08 UTC