- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:07:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28229
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
I think the idea of testing for conditions that strongly suggest a very high
probability of non-randomness is reasonable enough. The problems are in the
execution.
The fn:error() paths would be better written to simply return false().
And yes, the test should be in test set fn-random-number-generator.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 18:07:38 UTC