- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:07:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28229 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike@saxonica.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I think the idea of testing for conditions that strongly suggest a very high probability of non-randomness is reasonable enough. The problems are in the execution. The fn:error() paths would be better written to simply return false(). And yes, the test should be in test set fn-random-number-generator. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 18:07:38 UTC