https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28229 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike@saxonica.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I think the idea of testing for conditions that strongly suggest a very high probability of non-randomness is reasonable enough. The problems are in the execution. The fn:error() paths would be better written to simply return false(). And yes, the test should be in test set fn-random-number-generator. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 18:07:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:53 UTC