- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:06:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28833 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I agree with the analysis; the question is how best to fix it. Higher-order operands appear where any of the following applies: (1) The context item for evaluation of O is different from the context item for evaluation of C. (2) C is an instruction and O is a pattern (as with the from and count attributes of xsl:number, and the group-starting-with and group-ending-with attributes of xsl:for-each-group). (3) C is an XPath for, some, or every expression and O is the expression in its return or satisfies clause. (4) C is an inline function declaration and O is the expression in its body. Case 1: For XPath expressions, the relevant cases are path expressions, bang expressions, and filter expressions. For XSLT instructions, there are quite a few: analyze-string, copy[@select], for-each, for-each-group, iterate, merge, merge-key, xsl:sort, xsl:key(?) Case 2: Applies only to for-each-group and xsl:number. In for-each-group, neither of the two notes at the end of 19.8.4.19 discuss the patterns. They need to. xsl:number uses the GSRs, so it is OK. Case 3: The GSRs apply, so this case is OK. Case 4: Section 9.8.8.15 deals with references to streaming parameters, but not with current(). There seem to be sufficiently many that a general statement is needed. Is it sufficient to say that current() and references to streaming parameters are roaming and free-ranging if used within a higher order operand of a construct whose focus-setting container is not grounded? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 17:06:36 UTC