- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:48:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28774 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Response on behalf of the Working Group: The working group felt that there was no problem with the way that shallow-skip handles text (and comment/PI) nodes: the built-in template for element nodes applies-templates to its children, and the built-in template for text nodes does nothing; so if you want to process all the text nodes, you can simply define a rule to process those text nodes. However the WG accepted that there is a usability problem with attribute nodes, and resolved to fix this by changing the built in template rule for document and element nodes to do the following: <xsl:template match="." mode="M"> <xsl:apply-templates select="@*" mode="M"/> <xsl:apply-templates select="node()" mode="M"/> </xsl:template> which is aligned with the behaviour of shallow-copy. The effect is that if you want to process attribute nodes, you simply add template rules that match the attribute nodes to be processed. In the absence of such rules, the behaviour is unchanged, since the default rule for attribute nodes is to do nothing. Many thanks for raising the issue. We would be grateful if you would indicate your acceptance of the response by marking it closed, but if you want to re-open the issue with new information you are welcome to do so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 08:48:25 UTC