https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27918 --- Comment #2 from Rob <r.stapper@lijbrandt.nl> --- I can see that serialization of functions, especially of function results, isn't something you should be willing to do and probably not even permit it for implementations. On the other hand, purely from a user-perspective, I strongly feel the need for serialization of my internal datarecords, which in my experience are best suited by closure-functions except, helas, in case of standard serialization. Probably we need another approach to get out of this split: f.e. the datarecord as a formal datatype with the same behaviour as closure-functions and the possibility to being serialized. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 14:06:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:52 UTC