W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2015

[Bug 27918] serialization output for functions

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:06:24 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-27918-523-A4ItcCf6IO@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #2 from Rob <r.stapper@lijbrandt.nl> ---
I can see that serialization of functions, especially of function results,
isn't something you should be willing to do and probably not even permit it for

On the other hand, purely from a user-perspective, I strongly feel the need for
serialization of my internal datarecords, which in my experience are best
suited by closure-functions except, helas, in case of standard serialization.

Probably we need another approach to get out of this split: f.e. the datarecord
as a formal datatype with the same behaviour as closure-functions and the
possibility to being serialized.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 14:06:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:52 UTC