- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:47:16 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27619 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- The XSL WG reaffirmed its previous view that we do not want to require all products to support all locales; and short of that, we don't see any prospect for defining a minimum subset of locales. This applies equally to collation parameters such as backwards=yes (treating the last accent as the most significant). We think that the two rules we have defined will achieve the desired level of interoperability: * fallback=no means that if the implementation supports what you ask for, you get fully interoperable results, and if it doesn't, you get an error * fallback-yes means that your code will work with every implementation, but may produce slightly different results. We believe that if we tried to raise the conformance bar higher than this, then there would be environments (e.g. embedded devices) where producing a conformant processor would not be economically viable, and the effect would be either that the spec is not implemented at all in those environments, or that the implementations choose to be non-conformant. We are therefore respectfully declining this suggestion. (Note, the XSL WG and XQuery WG agreed that XSL WG would lead on responding to this set of bug reports, so this decision does not need further endorsement by XQuery WG). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 18:47:17 UTC