- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:02:03 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27648 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- At the WG telcon today, the WG found itself leaning towards option 1(c), and the editor was asked to draft a formal proposal. Here it is. In 3.6.3, Named Components in Packages: Delete accumulators from the list here: The components which can be declared in one package and referenced in another are: functions, named templates, attribute sets, modes, accumulators, and global variables and parameters. Add accumulators here ("keys and accumulators"): In addition, keys are classified as named components ... In "Examples of constructs that give rise to symbolic references..., ; and XPath function calls referring to stylesheet functions or accumulator functions.], delete "or accumulator functions". In "Keys behave rather differently from other components. " generalize the text so it covers accumulators as well as keys. But observe that accumulators can also be referenced statically, in the use-accumulators attribute of xsl:global-context-item and xsl:stream and xsl:merge-source. These references are like other references to private components: the declaration must be in the same package as the reference. In 3.6.3.1 visibility of components Delete accumulators from the list of components that have a visibility attribute. Delete xsl:accumulator from the content model of xsl:expose. In 3.6.3.2 accepting components Delete xsl:accumulator from the content model of xsl:accept. In 3.6.3.3 Overriding Components from a Used Package Delete xsl:accumulator from the content model of xsl:override. Remove text referring specifically to overriding of accumulators, including the rules for compatibility of accumulators. Add a section 3.6.3.5 Dynamic references to components (Precis) There are several functions in which a dynamically-evaluated QName is used to identify a component: key(), accumulator-before/after(), function-lookup(). In all these cases, the set of components that are available to be referenced are those that are declared in the package where this function call appears. The reference succeeds irrespective of the visibility of the component, unless the visibility is abstract (applies to functions only) in which case it is not available to be referenced in this way. If (this also applies only to functions) the relevant component has been overridden, the overriding declarations are not considered. However, a function declared within xsl:override will be found, provided the function-lookup call appears in the same package as the xsl:override. [Check and reiterate the rules for dynamic invocations of key(), accumulator-before/after(), and function-lookup()]. In 3.6.5 Declarations Local to a Package "Declarations of keys, decimal formats, namespace aliases..." - add accumulators. In 18.2.1 Delete the visibility attribute of xsl:accumulator In 18.2.5, error condition [ERR XTDE3340], change "accumulator visible in the package" to "accumulator declared in the package". Delete section 18.2.7, but retain [ERR XTSE3350], moving it into 18.2.1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 22:02:04 UTC